|
In 2002 Sonatrach will
experience its most
important change to date,
a change that will force its international expansion. |
|
il
and gas is the unconditional wealth of Algeria. Hydrocarbon
exports have financed Algeria’s post-independence development and
they’re the key reason why the country’s GDP per capita is three
times that of its neighbors to the south. |
 |
|
But Algeria is also highly dependent on the industry. Despite
years of effort to diversify its export and revenue bases, oil and
gas traditionally represent 95% of total exports, 60% of state
revenue and 25% to 35% of GDP.
In view of this dominance, it is somewhat ironic that Algeria is
considered under-explored in terms of hydrocarbon resources.
According to the Ministry of Energy and Mines, Algeria has only
eight exploration wells per 10,000 km2, compared to the world
average of 100 wells. With a total territory of over 1.5 million
km2, the potential of this sector is indeed enormous.
The result has been intense efforts at restructuring the sector to
encourage competition and increase the level of foreign investment.
Most fundamental in this is reforming the country’s national oil and
gas company, Sonatrach. In terms of turnover – $22 billion in 2000 –
Sonatrach is far-and-away Africa’s largest corporation. |

t
ranks as the 12th largest petroleum corporation in the world and its
gas exports, both of LPG (liquid petroleum gas) and natural gas, are
among, if not the, world’s largest. With over 48,000 employees and
approximately 120,000 when including its subsidiaries, reorganizing
the firm is no easy task.
The prospect of outright, or partial, privatization of Sonatrach has
not been greeted warmly in Algeria. The powerful labor confederation,
UGTA, last year threatened industrial action if Dr. Chekib Khelil,
Algeria’s Minister for Energy and Mines (and formerly OPEC President
in 2001), pushes forward divestment legislation. Nevertheless, the
essential objective of the minister’s reforms has not wavered. The
intention, proposed in a new draft law for liberalization of the
hydrocarbons sector, is to fully commercialize the company by
separating its operational procedures and responsibilities from those
of its owner, the state, and expose it to full competition. “The only
responsibility Sonatrach should have,” says Dr. Khelil, “is to make
money, create employment and be competitive.”
THE MOST IMPORTANT STEP
will be to establish two independent agencies. The first, called
ALNAFT, will exist to award future exploration and production
contracts to investors through an open bidding process and provide
information on investment opportunities; a 0.5% share of oil royalties
will finance it. Sonatrach, which currently performs this role, will
no longer be in the position to award the contract and therefore will
operate on an equal footing with other investors in the sector. The
second agency, the Regulatory Authority, will be responsible for
administrative and regulatory activities in the sector, such as
ensuring each player has access to oil and gas transportation
infrastructure and so on; it will be financed by charging a service
fee. Removing these activities from Sonatrach and handing them to
independent, self-financed agencies will erase potential conflicts of
interest Sonatrach may have in its partnerships with foreign
investors.
The changes will also put Sonatrach on a much more sound commercial
footing. With its future income contractually based, it will not need
to haggle with the government’s budget committee each year, allowing
it to plan for the long term.
The requirement upon Sonatrach to build and maintain transportation
pipelines will also be removed, with new construction being offered to
any investor on an open bidding basis. Pipelines are not high-return
operations and giving Sonatrach the right to pick and chose will
reinforce the firm’s ability to improve financial management.
MORE CONTROVERSIAL,
however, is the draft law’s proposal to limit Sonatrach’s share in all
future commercial discoveries and pipelines to 25% (with the maximum
duration of 32 years for exploration and production concessions, 50
years for transport concessions). This will most likely lower the
government’s take over the long term when compared to the current
production-sharing system. The point, says the government, is that
this is the price to be paid for increased private investment in the
sector, especially in the currently unexplored basins or small and
marginal fields.
Anti-privatization proponents are afraid, of course, that the broad
aim of the draft law – to expose Sonatrach to full competition – is
merely the thin end of wedge. Like other national oil and gas
companies whose monopoly fell in the face of economic reform, reduced
opportunity in Sonatrach’s home market will more than likely lead to a
strategy of international expansion. Sonatrach already has an
international presence: a contract for pipeline construction and
another for gas field development, both in Latin America. It has a
joint venture with Agip in Yemen, it is developing a polypropylene
plant in Spain with BASF and it owns a trading company in Singapore.
Nonetheless compared to other of the world’s large oil and gas firms,
this is still a very small portfolio.
The question, then, will be how to finance greater expansion. The most
obvious way will be to raise funds on the international capital
markets by selling shares and issuing bonds. Separating the operations
of the state from Sonatrach will be the first step in demonstrating
that it is acting in a more commercially oriented way; opening its
capital to investors may well be the next logical step.
THE REFORM PROCESS
will also affect Sonatrach’s subsidiary companies that operate both
upstream and downstream in the oil and gas industry. One example is
the National Enterprise for Well Works (ENTP). Although ostensibly
created in 1983, it actually took shape 33 years ago as a branch of
Sonatrach that was subsequently made into a subsidiary company. Today
it is commercially independent, free to make its own joint-venture
agreements and operates in competition with foreign powers such as
Schlumberger and Halliburton.
Drilling both for Sonatrach and for foreign companies in Algeria with
exploration contracts, such as BHP, Cepsa and Anadarko Petroleum, ENTP
commands around 40% to 45% of the market. It has also entered into a
joint venture with the Dutch firm, Deutag. Mr. Abdelaziz Krissat, the
firm’s CEO, says that opportunities for increased business and
partnership will come fast thanks to the upcoming deregulation of the
sector. “Fifteen years ago, we would never have believed where we are
today. In the 1980s, there was speculation that our wells would go dry
by 2005 and hence business would dry up too. But today, with new
discoveries, we still have the same level of reserves we had in the
1970s; we still have at least 30 years ahead of us. So for us, we
think of it as starting from square one, only we now have 30 years of
experience behind us.” |